New guidance published for employers on setting dress codes and sex discrimination

Source: Government Equalities Office | | 21/05/2018

Following a joint report ("High heels and workplace dress codes") published by the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee and Petitions Committee in January 2017, the Government Equalities Office has finally published promised new guidance on “Dress codes and sex discrimination – what you need to know”.

The new guidance is aimed at employers who set dress codes and employees and job applicants who may have to abide by them. It advises employers that while dress codes can be a legitimate part of their terms and conditions of employment and dress policies for men and women do not have to be identical, the standards imposed should be equivalent or similar. It also warns that gender specific prescriptive requirements, such as requirements for women to wear high heels, make up, skirts, manicured nails, certain hairstyles or specific types of hosiery, are likely to be unlawful. In addition, it states that dress codes must not be a source of harassment by work colleagues or customers, for example expecting women to dress in a provocative manner or to wear revealing clothing. According to the guidance, a dress code that requires all employees to dress smartly would be lawful, provided the definition of “smart” is reasonable, such as a two-piece suit with low-heeled shoes for both sexes.

Although the guidance is specifically aimed at preventing sex discrimination and harassment, it also covers making reasonable adjustments to dress codes for disabled employees and allowing transgender employees to follow a dress code in a way which they feel matches their gender identity and it urges employers to be flexible and not set dress codes which prohibit religious symbols that do not interfere with an employee’s work.

The guidance is non-statutory, meaning it is not provided for in legislation and need not be taken into account by employment tribunals. It is simply aimed at assisting with employers’ and employees’ understanding of the law.



 

Latest News

Tax gap lowered according to HMRC
21/06/2018 - More...
HMRC has published figures that show the tax gap for the 2016-17 tax year was 5.7%. The tax gap is basically the

M&S lose expensive VAT case
21/06/2018 - More...
The First-Tier Tribunal recently heard an appeal that considered the correct VAT treatment of a promotional offer by the

Self-assessment second instalment due end of July
21/06/2018 - More...
Taxpayers that make payments on account should be aware that the second payment on account for 2017-18 is due on or

Search News


Newsletter

With our newsletter, you automatically receive our latest news by e-mail and get access to the archive including advanced search options!

» Sign up for the Newsletter
» Login

» Cookie Policy

» Privacy Policy

Social Media

twit-new